Adeel, M. A. (2015). Evolution of Quine’s Thinking on the Thesis of Underdetermination and Scott Soames’s Accusation of Paradoxicality. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 56-69.
Bruun, H. H., & Whimster, S. (Eds.). (2012). Max Weber: Collected Methodological Writings. London and New York: Routledge.
Davydova, I., & Sharrock, W. (2003). The Rise and Fall of the Fact/Value Distinction. The Sociological Review, 51(3), 357–375. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00425
de Regt, H. W. (2017). Understanding Scientific Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Regt, H. W., Leonelli, S., & Eigner, K. (Eds.). (2009). Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Elgin, C. (2007). Understanding and the facts. Philosophical Studies, 132, 33-42.
Elgin, C. Z. (2017). True Enough. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
Grimm, S. R., Baumberger, C., & Ammon, S. (Eds.). (2017). Explaning Understanding: New Perspectives from Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
Jasanoff, S. (2012). Science and Public Reason. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kellert, S. H., Longino, H. E., & Waters, C. K. (2006). Scientific Pluralism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kitcher, P. (2011). Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Kölbel, M. (2011). Objectivity, Relativism and Context Dependence. Hagen: Fernuniversität in Hagen.
Koskinen, I. (2020). Defending a Risk Account of Scientific Objectivity. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 71(4), 1187-1207. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axy053
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ludwig, D., & Ruphy, S. (2021). Scientific Pluralism. Retrieved from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/scientific-pluralism/
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 3rd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Marchetti, G., & Marchetti, S. (Eds.). (2017). Facts and Values: The Ethics and Metaphysics of Normativity. New York and London: Routledge.
Misbah Yazdi, M. (1999). Philosophical Instructions. (M. Legenhausen & Sarvdalir, Trans.) Binghamton: IGCS and Brigham Young University.
Plantinga, A. (1996). Methodological Naturalism? In J. M. van der Meer (Ed.), Facets of Faith and Science (pp.177-221). Lanham: University Press of America.
Plantinga, A. (2010). Science and religion: why does the debate continue. In M. Y. Stewart (Ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue (pp.301-316). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Plantinga, A. (2011). Where the Conflict Really Lies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Proctor, R. N. (1991). Value-Free Science? Purity and Power in Modern Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Putnam, H. (2002). The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. v. (1992). Pursuit of Truth, revised edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Stanford, K. (2021, Winter). Underdetermination of Scientific Theory. Retrieved from The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/scientific-underdetermination/
Stanford, P. K. (2006). Exceeding our grasp: science, history, and the problem of unconceived alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Fraassen, B. C. (2002). The Empirical Stance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Veigl, S. J. (2021). Notes on a complicated relationship: scientific pluralism, epistemic relativism, and stances. Synthese, 199, 3485–3503.
doi: 10.1007/s11229-020-02943-2
Villa, D. (2019). Weber and the Frankfurt School. In P. E. Gordon, E. Hammer, & A. Honneth (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to the Frankfurt School (pp.266-281). New York and London: Routledge.
